Thursday, April 28, 2022

Thursday's Parsha Tidbits - Parshas Acharei Mos

The following is a brief summary of some of thoughts said over by R' Frand on the parsha this evening. I have attempted to reproduce these vorts to the best of my ability. Any perceived inconsistency is the result of my efforts to transcribe the shiur and should not be attributed to R' Frand.

The beginning of Parshas Acharei Mos contains the Kriyah for Yom Kippur. At the end of the Kriyah (Vayikra 16:34) the Torah states וְהָֽיְתָה־זֹּ֨את לָכֶ֜ם לְחֻקַּ֣ת עוֹלָ֗ם לְכַפֵּ֞ר עַל־בְּנֵ֤י יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ מִכָּל־חַטֹּאתָ֔ם אַחַ֖ת בַּשָּׁנָ֑ה. Rabbi Frand quoted the Chasam Sofer who asks - why does the Torah need to state that Yom Kippur comes once a year? Rosh Hashana also comes once a year, as does Pesach and Sukkos!

The Chasam Sofer answers that it is not talking about Yom Kippur per se, it is discussing the death of a tzaddik. In the same way that Yom Kippur is Mechaper for the Jewish people, so is the death of a tzaddik. Thus the pasuk is a prayer that we will only need one Yom Kippur to be Mechaper for us each year.

R' Frand then quoted R' Elya Lopian who had said this vort on Yom Kippur in the 1950s. At the time, the Brisker Rav was very ill and in fact he passed away on Yom Kippur that year. R' Frand theorized that R' Elya knew that the Brisker Rav was sick but was unaware that he had already passed. Perhaps R' Elya had said this vort as a prayer that the Brisker Rav would recuperate.

R' Frand a second vort related to the Avodah on Yom Kippur. We see from the pesukim that first the Kohain Gadol would slaughter the bull which was to be offered, but after catching the blood in a Kli Shares he did not throw the blood immediately on the Mizbeyach and would instead give it to another Kohain to stir the blood so that it would not congeal. 

What did the Kohain Gadol do in the interim? He would go into the Kodesh HaKodashim to offer the Ketores.

But why was the Avodah split up? Wouldn't it be more logical to complete the process with the bull before bringing the Ketores?

R' Frand answered by quoting the Chofetz Chaim who noted that the Ketores was Mechaper for the sin of Lashon Hara. And as long as the Jews had not received atonement for that sin, the bull would not be able to achieve Kaparah for them. Therefore the Kohain Gadol had to bring the Ketores first and only afterwards complete the process with the bull.

R' Frand said a final vort related to the sin of consuming blood. The Torah states in Vayikra 17:10 וְאִ֨ישׁ אִ֜ישׁ מִבֵּ֣ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וּמִן־הַגֵּר֙ הַגָּ֣ר בְּתוֹכָ֔ם אֲשֶׁ֥ר יֹאכַ֖ל כָּל־דָּ֑ם וְנָֽתַתִּ֣י פָנַ֗י בַּנֶּ֨פֶשׁ֙ הָֽאֹכֶ֣לֶת אֶת־הַדָּ֔ם וְהִכְרַתִּ֥י אֹתָ֖הּ מִקֶּ֥רֶב עַמָּֽהּ. Rashi comments that in making this pronouncement, Hashem said that if someone eats blood, He will turn away from His other pursuits and focus solely on the person who consumed the blood.

R' Frand found this term curious, given that Hashem is not mortal and does not need to focus entirely on any one topic or person. R' Frand addressed this point by quoting R' Elya Meir Bloch who equates this to a war. When a country goes to war it is generally known why the war took place. By example, Russia went to war against Ukraine because Russia wants to conquer the land. However the impact of the war can be felt in many other places. (R' Frand quipped that one man's hurricane is another man's treasure). This impact can be for positive or negative (like today's fuel prices). We don't know what Hashem's plan was and what the main purpose of allowing the war to take place. But Hashem has His plan in this regard and His focus is direct.

If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up!


Sunday, April 10, 2022

Sunday Night Suds - New Belgium Voodoo Ranger Juice Force IPA


This week's Sunday Night Suds looks at New Belgium Voodoo Ranger Juice Force IPA.

Long time fans of New Belgium are aware that they keep pumping out new varieties in the Voodoo Ranger series. This brew was available in singles at the ShopRite next door to my office and once I purchased it I put it away to share with KBJr once he came back from his second year in Yeshiva in Israel. 

By my count, this is the fifteenth Voodoo Ranger that New Belgium has released. Previously reviewed Voodoo Ranger brews include:















The newest addition to the Voodoo Ranger series is oversized can which runs less than $3.00 at the supermarket so its got a lot of bang for the buck. And with an alcohol content of 9.5% abv that's quite a bang.

As a final Sunday Night Suds ahead of Pesach, this was quite a beer. The beer is full of fruit - mostly grapefruit and tangerine. KBJr could not believe that this beer was unflavored, but its all from the hops. The beer poured a rich gold with a complex flavor profile that evolved from sip to sip.

The New Belgium Juice Force IPA is under kosher supervision by the Scroll-K/Va'ad of Denver, although there is no kosher symbol on the can (I did verify it with the Scroll-K via e-mail). However, not every brew produced by New Belgium is under kosher supervision, so look for the Scroll K on the six pack holder or box when considering purchasing any NBB product. Many of the "sours" such as the Peach Kick which was released over the summer cannot be certified kosher.

To see what the experts on Beer Advocate think about New Belgium Voodoo Ranger Juice Force IPA, click here https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/192/585930.

As always, please remember to drink responsibly and to never waste good beer unless there is no designated driver.

If you've tried this beer or any others which have been reviewed on the kosher beers site, please feel free to post your comments (anonymous comments are acceptable).

If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up! 

Thursday, April 7, 2022

Thursday's Parsha Tidbits - Parshas Metzorah

Due to this being the last Thursday Night shiur before Pesach, R' Frand did not deliver his live shiur. However R' Frand did post a pre-recorded Parsha vort on OU Torah which I have summarized here. This week's vort can be found at https://outorah.org/p/12907, but I have attempted to reproduce the vort to the best of my ability in this post.  Any perceived inconsistency is the result of my efforts to transcribe the shiur and should not be attributed to the maggid shiur.

R' Frand began by stating that Tzara'as is not leprosy as that is a physical ailment and this is spiritual. R' Frand first quoted a pasuk from last week's Parsha (Vayikra 13:2) in which the Torah states that if a person has one of the nega'im he should go to Aharon or one of his sons. R' Frand quipped that a person with Tzara'as does not go to the dermatologist, he goes to a Kohain.

Rashi explains the pasuk as teaching that only a Kohain can pasken, even if he is the greatest scholar. Only a Kohain can make the determination. R' Frand then quoted the Rambam who stated that if there is a Kohain who was not the biggest Talmid Chacham and did not know the status of what he was looking at, he must find a Talmid Chacham to tell him what to do. If the Talmid Chacham says "pure" the Kohain must repeat it. Similarly with being masgir or saying tamei. And even if the Kohain is a Shoteh or Katan, he must parrot the words of the Talmid Chacham and the psak is done.

R' Frand quoted the Minchas Chinuch who theorized about a blind Kohain and stated that since he is merely repeating the words of the Talmid Chacham he should be able to give "psak" even if he cannot see. Although the Mei'ri disagrees, R' Frand asked why should he not be able to just repeat it?

R' Frand quoted the Tolner Rebbi who said that sight is required. He noted that the pesukim in Megillas Eicha are alphabetical and that in the alphabet the Ayin goes before the Peh. But in the third and fifth perakim of Eicha they are inverted. Why? The Gemara in Sanhedrin writes that the spies told their lies about the Land of Israel on Tisha B'av, and in so doing they put their mouth (peh) before what they saw (ayin). This is what Tisha B'av is about, speaking bad without seeing and the Megillah hints to that.

R' Frand said we can now understand why a Kohain Shoteh can say Tamei or Tahor but not a blind Kohain. Because before saying something about someone, you need to see him first. And before jumping to conclusions about a person, you should see him. You need to see the full story, thus a blind Kohain cannot pasken about Tzara'as, because he cannot see what happened.

R' Frand closed by saying if we just restricted what we spoke about to what we saw, the amount of Loshson Hara would be cut down immensely.

If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up!

Thursday, March 31, 2022

Thursday's Parsha Tidbits - Parshas Tazria

The following is a brief summary of some of thoughts said over by R' Frand on the parsha this evening. I have attempted to reproduce these vorts to the best of my ability. Any perceived inconsistency is the result of my efforts to transcribe the shiur and should not be attributed to R' Frand.

In Vayikra 13:3 the Torah states וְרָאָ֣ה הַכֹּהֵ֣ן אֶת־הַנֶּ֣גַע בְּעֽוֹר־הַ֠בָּשָׂ֠ר וְשֵׂעָ֨ר בַּנֶּ֜גַע הָפַ֣ךְ | לָבָ֗ן - the Kohain examines the Nega and and if the hair within it has turned white the Kohain rules him to be Tamei. R' Frand quoted R' Melech Biderman who asks - why is the presence of white a sign of Tumah? Generally things which are white have a positive connotation.

By example, when the Seir L'Azazel is thrown off the cliff, when the string turns white the people they have been forgiven. Similarly, the analogy that Hashem makes when talking about Teshuva that if people's sins are red they will be whiten like snow.  So why is white a sign of Tumah by Tzara'as?

He answers that a person can be a Tzaddik and as white as snow. But if he speaks Lashon Hara he is still Tamei.

R' Frand said a second vort related to Tzara'as which had a keen observation as to who can be healed. The Torah states in Vayikra 13:18 - וּבָשָׂ֕ר כִּי־יִֽהְיֶ֥ה בֽוֹ־בְעֹר֖וֹ שְׁחִ֑ין וְנִרְפָּֽא - that if there is an inflammation on flesh and it heals. The Gemara in Sotah 5a observes that the only time in the discussion of Tzara'as that the Torah uses the word healed is when the Torah is discussing flesh. Rashi clarifies that the Torah does not use that term in connection with the word אָדָ֑ם. 

R' Frand quoted the Yechi Reuven who writes that if a person is as soft as flesh, then he can be healed. But if he is hard like earth (אָדָ֑ם) then he cannot. He tied this into a discussion of the Mishkan which had a miraculous beam called the Briach HaTichon - a center pole which was threaded through and bent with the three walls of the Mishkan. But why was this miracle even necessary? Couldn't there simply have been three beams? He answers that the Shechinah dwells in the Mishkan and if a person wants the Shechinah to dwell in him, he needs to bend as well.

R' Frand tied this into a vort from R' Chaim Shmuelevitz who quoted a Gemara which states that a person is a Ben Olah Habah if he has bent knees. R' Chaim explains that the Gemara does not mean that the person will get Olam Habah, but that the person will be a Ben Olam Habah in this world. Why does this come to him? Because if he is willing to bend and not stand on principle (except when necessary) he will be able to enjoy Olam Habah while still here.

If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up!

Thursday, March 24, 2022

Thursday's Parsha Tidbits - Parshas Shemini

The following is a brief summary of some of thoughts said over by R' Frand on the parsha this evening. I have attempted to reproduce these vorts to the best of my ability. Any perceived inconsistency is the result of my efforts to transcribe the shiur and should not be attributed to R' Frand.

In Vayikra 9:3, Moshe is instructed to tell the Jews to take a  שְׂעִֽיר־עִזִּים֙ לְחַטָּ֔את. The Toras Kohanim explains that that this was an atonement for the sale of Yosef.

R' Frand then quoted the Meshech Chachma who asks - why did the Jews need to atone for the sale of Yosef now? When they left Egypt they were not told to do this, or even when they received the Torah. Why did they need to atone now? He answered that it was because the dedication of the Mishkan took place after the sin of the Egel. Prior to that point, the Jews could have said - why did Yosef go Yaakov to complain about us? He should have told us what our issue was and we would have accepted the Mussar. 

R' Frand compared this to the person who complains to the principal that his child has an issue with a teacher. The first step should have been the father going to discuss his concern with the teacher directly and only if he was unsuccessful should he go to the principal.

But after the sin of the Egel the Jews could no longer say - we would have accepted Mussar. During that episode, Chur tried to rebuke them and he was killed because the Jews were unwilling to accept rebuke. Now that they lost that claim, it was time to bring an atonement for selling Yosef.

R' Frand said a second vort related to the pasuk in Vayikra 9:7 which states - וַיֹּ֨אמֶר משֶׁ֜ה אֶל־אַֽהֲרֹ֗ן קְרַ֤ב אֶל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֨חַ֙ . The Targum explains that Aharon was embarrassed and did not want to approach the altar and that Moshe told him to go because for this you were chosen.

R' Frand quoted the Arizal who explained that Moshe told Aharon - specifically because you are reluctant to take this role - that is why you were selected for it.

R' Frand then told a story about R' Tzvi Pesach Frank. When he was approached to be the Rav of Yerushalaim, those who came to him said - the people of Yerushalaim have so many problems and began to list them. He then said - I know about their problems, but why are you mentioning them to me? They responded, because we need a Rav with that thought process - someone who thinks that he is not important enough to have the problems brought to him.

R' Frand then quoted the Imrei Emes who explained the pasuk based on a thought from R' Chaim Vital. He explained that everyone comes to this world with a particular character flaw he needs to fix. If a person wants to know what that is, he should think about what his biggest problem is and that is what he needs to fix. Maybe he is jealous, or easy to anger - that is what he should fix. This was Moshe's message to Aharon - you are reluctant to take this position - this is what you were chosen to do in this world.

R' Frand said a third vort related to the three animals which chew their cud but do not have split hooves. By the camel the Torah states in Vayikra 11:4 not to eat it because וּפַרְסָה֙ אֵינֶ֣נּוּ מַפְרִ֔יס - it presently does not have split hooves. By the hyrax the Torah states in Vayikra 11:5  וּפַרְסָ֖ה לֹ֣א יַפְרִ֑יס - it will not have split hooves. By the hare the Torah states in Vayikra 11:6 וּפַרְסָ֖ה לֹ֣א הִפְרִ֑יסָה - it did not have split hooves.

Why did the Torah use three different tenses?

R' Frand answered (without attribution) that it is because before a person condemns another as unclean, he needs to be sure that he knows the person's past, present and future. Until you know the whole story you should not label someone as tamei.

R' Frand linked this to a story where R' Shach was approached about throwing a boy out of the yeshiva because he was smoking on Shabbos. R' Shach said - do you know his parents? Do you know his chavrusa? Until you know the entire story he should not be thrown out as there is more to it if he is smoking on Shabbos. And he was not thrown out.

R' Frand closed with a story about a post-Holocaust family wherein the husband no longer wanted to go to shul. Every morning he would go to the newsstand and buy a newspaper and then come home and read it, instead of going to shul. One day his wife said to him - why not take the paper and read it in shul? He listened to his wife and went to shul every day and read the paper in the back of the shul. To their credit, the shul members did not throw him out and even invited him when there was a tikkun after davening. Because he was not condemned by the members of the shul he eventually began davening again and was chozer b'teshuva.

If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up!

Thursday, March 17, 2022

Thursday's Parsha Tidbits - Parshas Tzav

Due to today being Purim there was no live Rabbi Frand shiur on the Parsha. However R' Frand did post a pre-recorded Parsha vort on OU Torah which I have summarized here. This week's vort can be found at https://outorah.org/p/119886, but I have attempted to reproduce the vort to the best of my ability in this post.  Any perceived inconsistency is the result of my efforts to transcribe the shiur and should not be attributed to the maggid shiur.

R' Frand noted that Parshas Tzav is usually Shabbos HaGadol but due to being a leap year it is not this year. R' Frand then spoke about the Karban Todah which is mentioned here, whereas all the other Karbanos are in Parshas Vayikra. In fact, Parshas Tzav focuses on the instruction to the Kohanim on how to the avodah. So why is this here as opposed to in Parshas Vayikra and why is it mentioned in the midst of the discussions of the instructions to the Kohanim.

R' Frand quoted Rashi who explains that a Karban Torah is brought when a miracle occurs for a person, either release from jail, or being healed or traversing an ocean or a desert. This is Birkas HaGomel that is made now instead of a Karban Torah. 

R' Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld wonders why Rashi says that the Karban is brought for a miracle. The ten plagues is a miracle, the splitting of the sea was a miracle. But is crossing the ocean a miracle? He answers, yes - that we successfully traverse the ocean is a miracle - its one of everyday miracles as we say in Modim (Al Nisecha SheB'Chol Yom Imanu). When a person is sick and becomes well because Hashem has healed him, its a miracle. 

R' Frand said that we saw through COVID how tenuous our health was. We see that a person can resume daily activities 4 weeks after bypass surgery, but bypass means that his heart was not pumping normally for a period of time. Now he is walking around, but its not "modern medicine" its a miracle from heavens. We need to keep this in mind, its not just medicine.

R' Frand quoted a Gemara in Berachos 7 that states that no one said thanks to Hashem until Leah had Yehuda. Everyone asks, could it be that no one said thanks? Noach brought a Korban, the Avos brought Karbanos. The answer is that the others brought sacrifices for miracles. Leah said thank you for the "every day" act of having a baby.

R' Frand told a story of a man who got married and a year later had a baby girl. He came to R' Shach and asked if he should make a Kiddush. R' Shach said to him - let me ask you a question - if you could not have a baby for eight years and after all that time you finally had one, would you ask if you should make a Kiddush? Hashem spared you the Agmas Nefesh, but why not make the Kiddush?

R' Frand said that this is what Rashi means - you had a successful trip with some danger and you made it through - its an everyday miracle, but a miracle nonetheless.

R' Yosef Chaim states - this is the reason why the Karban Todah is in Tzav - the Kohanim need it here. The Kohanim worked in the Beis HaMikdash where 10 miracles occur every day. If the same things happen every day you look past it. He gave an analogy to seeing Sheimos. If you see it on the floor you immediately pick it up. But if you worked in a printing house where they were printing seforim and you saw it on the floor you might not think it out of the ordinary.

This is why the Kohanim who were so used to seeing miracles, they needed to be reminded that surviving an operation or a trip, these are all miracles. They may not change the laws of nature, but they are miracles nonetheless.

If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up!