The following is a brief summary of some of thoughts said over by R' Frand on the parsha this evening. I have attempted to reproduce these vorts to the best of my ability. Any perceived inconsistency is the result of my efforts to transcribe the shiur and should not be attributed to R' Frand.
The first vort R' Frand said related to Avraham's stop at Shechem as mentioned in Bereishis 12:6. Rashi explains that the reason that Avraham stopped there was to daven for Ya'akov's children who one day would do battle in Shechem. R' Frand quoted the Sifsei Chachamim who ask an obvious question - if Avraham is davening for his great grandchildren, why does he later ask Hashem about not having children and only having Eliezer to perpetuate his legacy?
R' Frand next quoted the pasuk in Bereishis 15:3 - וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אַבְרָ֔ם הֵ֣ן לִ֔י לֹ֥א נָתַ֖תָּה זָ֑רַע וְהִנֵּ֥ה בֶן־בֵּיתִ֖י יוֹרֵ֥שׁ אֹתִֽי. He quoted the Ohr HaChaim HaKadosh who asks why does the Torah use the words הֵ֣ן לִ֔י - you have not given me?
R' Frand quoted the Netziv who answers this question by observing that this pasuk is linked to the previous pasuk in which Avraham states - מַה־תִּתֶּן־לִ֔י וְאָֽנֹכִ֖י הוֹלֵ֣ךְ עֲרִירִ֑י וּבֶן־מֶ֣שֶׁק בֵּיתִ֔י ה֖וּא דַּמֶּ֥שֶׂק אֱלִיעֶֽזֶר. He explains that Avraham was confident that he would have children and knew that he would have grandchildren. However you have not given me זָ֑רַע - I won't have children that I can teach and be my legacy. Its not enough for me to have children when I am an old man, because I won't have time to teach them and show them my ways.
This also explains the reason that the Gemara learns from the words וּבֶן־מֶ֣שֶׁק בֵּיתִ֔י ה֖וּא דַּמֶּ֥שֶׂק אֱלִיעֶֽזֶר that Eliezer was teaching Avraham's Torah. Avraham knew that Eliezer was capable of delivering his Torah, but Avraham was upset that his children won't be receiving and teaching what they learned from him. What I am and what I want to give over to my children, I will be too old to do. Because there is a special relationship between a father and son and to be an effective father, I can't do it when I am past my prime.
R' Frand said a second vort in the name of R' Ya'akov Gross from Lakewood, New Jersey. The vort related to the separation of Lot from Avraham in which Avraham gave Lot the choice of any part of the land to live in. In the middle of this discussion, the Torah states in Bereishis 13:11 - וַיִּבְחַר־ל֣וֹ ל֗וֹט אֵ֚ת כָּל־כִּכַּ֣ר הַיַּרְדֵּ֔ן וַיִּסַּ֥ע ל֖וֹט מִקֶּ֑דֶם. Rashi quotes a Medrash which states that Lot wanted to separate from Avraham and Hashem by going to this area. But where does the Medrash see this in the pesukim?
R' Frand answered that its from the word קֶּ֑דֶם - this refers to Hashem because He came before the world.
R' Frand quoted R' Matisyahu Solomon who cited R' Shneur Kotler on a pasuk in Parshas Ekev which states that Israel is not like Egypt that you left - because in Egypt you are guaranteed water as the Nile floods the fields. On the other hand, in Israel you need rain water and you will depend on Hashem for it.
How is this a selling point for the land of Israel? What happens if it does not rain?
R' Frand answered that its better to be in Israel and dependent on rain, than to be in Egypt where the moisture is a done deal. Because in Israel you will have a connection with me. This is why Lot wanted to separate, because he did not want to be connected to Hashem.
If you have seen this post being carried on another site, please feel free to click http://www.kosherbeers.blogspot.com to find other articles on the kosherbeers blogsite. Hey its free and you can push my counter numbers up!
